TRUST / TESTED CONTROLS, BOUNDED CLAIMS
Vetting is a scan.
Scans can be beaten.
Curation, owner-approved versions, exact hashes and limited profiles support review. A passing scan does not establish safety, authorship or permission to execute. T0 text remains untrusted.
- Whitespace past truncation
- The rule floor scans the full body; oversized text is quarantined. Tested with inert inflated fixtures, not every obfuscation.
- Bytecode
- Single text bodies and an allowlist for bundled support files reject bytecode. Later host downloads remain outside this control.
- Document archives
- Import rejects attachments and archives; no archive extraction. A host later fetching an archive remains outside this control.
- Scanner prompt injection
- An LLM verdict cannot erase rule-floor flags. SAFE/error responses in regression tests are test doubles; they do not prove real LLM robustness.
Hashes detect changed bytes against an unchanged pin. A compromised publisher could rewrite content and receipts together. Profiles do not sandbox host shell or network access.
Earned means at least three helpful task-linked agent verdicts. Those are self-reports. Uplift rows remain rubric unsigned; the current diagnostic does not support a measurable-improvement claim.
Read docs/trust-model.md: named tests and every boundary →